I recently asked my friends on Facebook and Twitter to help me fill out a survey. I have a secret admission: my intention was not to create or propose a new Netflix / Hulu / iTunes functionality. My intention was to see how many of my friends, who are relatively tech savvy, would reveal their propensity to share personal data
with an online video service. And it turns there are 4 brave souls who would share data! I want to raise
my glass to these 4 brave souls, and yet, part of me thinks they should be more hesitant.
Question 1:
To be fair, 100% of the survey respondents said yes to whether or not they had a Netflix / Hulu / iTunes service. This was satisfying to me, because I would expect no less of my friends. If someone did mark it as a no, I would have lost my mind trying to figure out who is still living in the 20th century. They probably chose not to fill the survey … so the final results here may be biased 🙂
Question 2:
The second question was also a filler question. Most of the people I know watch 30 minutes to an hour off an online video service.
Question 3
The third question is where it gets interesting. Let’s call this functionality S. I want to see this Functionality S in Netflix / Hulu / Movies on iTunes because I always fall asleep watching an episode or a movie before my wife does. And then going back the next day to watch the program means you have to watch the entire program from the start or struggle with streaming it to the exact spot (which I neverget exactly correct). Any small help in getting close to the spot where I fell asleep would help. I admit this is a very trivial problem; however, introducing ease of use in any product has always made it a great sale.
So what did my friends say? Apparently they agreed in majority. 70% of my friends thought it would be beneficial to have this option. 30 % said no, and no one skipped this question. I don’t know how many of the 30% have no partner / husband / wife. That is a piece of data I didn’t want to collect for obvious reasons.
Question 4:
For the next question, however, the tables turned. A large majority (greater than 80%) said no in regards to sharing any information about your partner / husband / wife to enable the Function S with the online service. In fact, some of you (slightly greater than 15%) might have been so turned off by the idea that you skipped this question. There were only 4 individuals who would share this data! Are these 4 brave souls or fools?
Side note: I wonder if anyone noticed that it was on the next page on purpose, to make sure there is little bias on the previous item from this question.
Thoughts:
I completely agree with the notion that sharing private details with an online video service can be difficult. However, I have to ask myself, most of the avenues where I asked the question are social media-based online services (cloud based services). These are online services where we are already exchanging this information. And with data mining and big data tools, being able to predict some of the semi-private information about your family has become easier. We all tag our spouses and partners on Facebook and Google+ pictures. Most of us exchange our family and partner’s geo data in our pictures and tweets as well. So what’s the harm in providing the partners’ basic information to an online video service?
The question becomes, are these 4 people actually smart to trade off functionality and ease of use for exchanging data that is already available? Or have they just given up the privacy and acknowledge that in this day and age it is not possible to maintain? And for the rest of us, why are we exchanging private data with sites like Facebook and Google+ but not others?
By the way, I don’t get to see the personal information of any of the respondents.
Credits:
I produced the graphs using Tableaupublic.com. For a deeper dive of the results, you can view it at https://public.tableausoftware.com/views/Onlinevideoinfosharingsurvey_0/Dashboard1?:embed=y&:showTabs=y&:display_count=yes.




